Mark Ward’s “Authorized” Lies: False Friends

If you haven't already, please see the introductory article to this series here. The more I look into the meat and substance of Mark Ward's book, the more that the issues become glaringly obvious.  The fact that some people are swallowing Ward's argument tells me a lot about those "swallowers".  As I said in my … Continue reading Mark Ward’s “Authorized” Lies: False Friends

GotQuestions.org on Bible Versions: Bad Questions. Even Worse Answers.

https://www.gotquestions.org/amp/Christians-agree-Bible.html See my earlier article about GotQuestions.org here. As usual, my comments are in bold. Question: "Why can’t all Christians agree on one Bible?" This is a naive question. A question that would be worth asking would be "Does God have one Bible?"  Christians will never agree on anything.  If we were to stick to this … Continue reading GotQuestions.org on Bible Versions: Bad Questions. Even Worse Answers.

Gotquestions.org Fails When It Discusses The King James Bible

GotQuestions is a good resource.  I am thankful for them and have used their information many times over the years.  However, they fall flat on their face when it comes to the Bible Version Issue.  This is not unlike CARM which just sent out a mass email that they would be showing the errors with … Continue reading Gotquestions.org Fails When It Discusses The King James Bible

Another Article by the Chrazy Christadelphians

The "Chrazy Christadelphians" have been at it again and have made yours truly the main object of their scorn for their last two articles.  I am ecstatic.  Praise the Lord! https://unmaskingantijehovahpeople.wordpress.com/2018/10/23/a-book-to-trust-18-available-in-many-languages-1/ I always kind of dislike writing objections to their articles because their English is so poor and I feel like I am picking on … Continue reading Another Article by the Chrazy Christadelphians

More Christadelphian Foolishness About the King James Bible

Since the Christadelphians have continued to visit my blog, I have decided to spend more time demonstrating their lies and falsehoods.  I enjoy doing this and this blog is a hobby of mine so I will continue to indulge my vanity. I have found a site organized by the Christadelphians with a series of questions … Continue reading More Christadelphian Foolishness About the King James Bible

A Classic Example Of Nothing Onlyism AND Dealing With “Updated” King James bibles…

So since this blog debuted a couple of years ago, a bunch of "Christadelphians" have repeatedly connected to my site and commented on several of my posts. Christadelphians reject the Trinity like JWs but they are a different organization.  They also dabble in the Hebrew Roots foolishness.  On the issue of Bible translation, they are … Continue reading A Classic Example Of Nothing Onlyism AND Dealing With “Updated” King James bibles…

Why The King James Bible? Outline For Your Visitation Bible

Why the King James Bible Promise of Preservation. Matt 24:35, Psalm 12:6,7 It has to be somewhere or Jesus and David lied. Time of Publication. Of the 7 periods of church history, Philadelphia is credited with having “kept my word” by Jesus Christ. This Philadelphia church age corresponds to about the years 1500 to 1900. … Continue reading Why The King James Bible? Outline For Your Visitation Bible

Why the King James Bible is Better than the Originals

Why the King James Bible is better than the originals Jer 36 - Originals destroyed, but then God made copy that was better (vs. 32). It exists. (Ecc 9:4) Multiple copies. Only one original. All books together. No complete Greek Bible until after 200 AD. No Hebrew until 1599 AD. Universal Language. No one speak … Continue reading Why the King James Bible is Better than the Originals

A Critique of George Lujack’s Critique of the King James Only Position

I truly enjoy critiquing other people's critiques.  I probably enjoy it a little too much.  Gott hilf mir. Today we will look at a paper by George Lujack.  This man is a New Yorker, who follows Messianic Judaism although he does not go so far as to reject the Apostle Paul.  Given enough time, either … Continue reading A Critique of George Lujack’s Critique of the King James Only Position